Sales to delivery
Closed deals in the CRM create projects, accounts or orders in the systems that deliver them.
(05)Service
05 / 07
(01)The problem
When systems don't share data, people do it for them: exporting, re-entering, reconciling. Records drift apart, nobody is sure which system is right, and every new tool adds another copy of the same information.
Orders, contacts or invoices are re-typed from one system into another.
Two systems disagree, and someone has to work out which is right.
An integration “usually works”, and nobody notices when it stops.
Connections built in a hurry years ago, that nobody wants to touch.
Every new tool means another manual process.
(02)The service
An integration moves data or actions between systems: a new order in the store becomes an invoice in accounting; a deal closed in the CRM creates a project in the delivery tool. Most modern software exposes an API for this. Older systems may need files, database access or a custom adapter.
The connection itself is usually the easy part. The real work is deciding which system owns each piece of data, how changes flow in each direction, and what happens when something fails halfway — because with enough volume, something will.
We design integrations to be observable and recoverable: every exchange is logged, failures are retried safely, and a person is told when something needs attention.
Integration architecture is a trade-off between speed now and order later.
| Direct connection | Central integration layer | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Two systems and one simple flow | Several systems sharing the same data |
| Setup | Quick | More design up front |
| When a system changes | Each connection is updated separately | Updated in one place |
| Visibility | Spread across connections | One place to monitor every flow |
(03)Use cases
Closed deals in the CRM create projects, accounts or orders in the systems that deliver them.
Store orders, payments and refunds flow into accounting without re-entry.
Data from several systems feeds a dashboard or warehouse using one set of definitions.
Spreadsheets and copy-paste routines between systems become automated, monitored flows.
(04)Specializations
Each area below sets out the problem it addresses, representative capabilities, an example and the outcome we aim for.
Connecting your systems to outside services through their APIs.
Keeping customer, sales, stock and finance data consistent between your core systems.
Connecting stores and marketplaces with stock, fulfillment, accounting and marketing.
Connecting payment providers to your product, store and accounting.
Connecting email, SMS, chat and telephony to the rest of your systems.
Moving and syncing data between databases, warehouses and applications.
Systems that react to events as they happen, instead of checking on a schedule.
Connecting your own applications, including older ones without modern APIs.
Connecting AI services and automation platforms safely to your business systems.
Making existing integrations dependable, and knowing when they aren't.
(05)In practice
What a single online order touches — and how each step is protected.
A customer pays in the online store, and the store sends an event.
The event is verified, stored and acknowledged, then queued for processing.
The customer and order are created in the ERP, and an invoice in accounting.
The warehouse gets the order. When it ships, tracking flows back to the store and the customer.
If accounting is unavailable, the step is retried later without creating a second invoice.
A daily check confirms every order exists in every system, and flags any that don't.
Illustrative. The systems and flows depend on your setup.
(06)Implementation
For each piece of data we agree which system is the source of truth, and what happens to edits made elsewhere.
Credentials are stored securely, tokens are refreshed before they expire, and each connection gets only the access it needs.
Rate limits, pagination and missing endpoints shape the design. We check them early, against the real API.
Real-time events, scheduled syncs or both — chosen by how fresh the data must be and how each system behaves.
Field mappings and rules are documented and kept in one place, so changing a field doesn't mean hunting through scripts.
(07)Quality & reliability
Temporary failures are retried with increasing waits, and idempotency keys stop retries from creating duplicate records or charges.
Messages that keep failing are held, with the error, until they're fixed and replayed.
Regular reconciliation compares systems and reports differences, instead of assuming they match.
Volumes, errors and delays are tracked, and a named owner is alerted when something needs attention.
(08)Related work
Client projects, and concept builds where they're labelled as such.
(10)FAQ
Often, yes — through file exports, database access, email or a custom adapter. It's less tidy than an API, so we'll explain the trade-offs before building.
Platforms suit common connections and modest volumes. Custom code suits complex logic, high volume, unusual systems or strict data requirements. Many setups use both.
The integration waits and retries. Messages are queued instead of lost, and if the outage lasts, the right person is alerted.
By agreeing which system owns each record, matching on reliable identifiers, and making every operation safe to repeat.
Yes. We start by mapping what exists and adding monitoring, so we can see what actually fails before we change anything.
Through regular reconciliation checks that compare systems and report differences, alongside monitoring of every flow.
(11)Contact
Tell us which systems you use and where information gets stuck between them. We'll suggest how to connect them, and what to watch out for.
contact@overc.io